[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <352f2a35d62399fce1dca0ce1158974ecda3904c.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:24:08 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/16] s390/pci: return error code from
s390_dma_map_sg()
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 10:45 -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>
>
> The .map_sg() op now expects an error code instead of zero on failure.
>
> So propagate the error from __s390_dma_map_sg() up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
> index ebc9a49523aa..c78b02012764 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> unsigned int max = dma_get_max_seg_size(dev);
> unsigned int size = s->offset + s->length;
> unsigned int offset = s->offset;
> - int count = 0, i;
> + int count = 0, i, ret;
>
> for (i = 1; i < nr_elements; i++) {
> s = sg_next(s);
> @@ -497,8 +497,9 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>
> if (s->offset || (size & ~PAGE_MASK) ||
> size + s->length > max) {
> - if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size,
> - &dma->dma_address, dir))
> + ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size,
> + &dma->dma_address, dir);
> + if (ret)
> goto unmap;
>
> dma->dma_address += offset;
> @@ -511,7 +512,8 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> }
> size += s->length;
> }
> - if (__s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir))
> + ret = __s390_dma_map_sg(dev, start, size, &dma->dma_address, dir);
> + if (ret)
> goto unmap;
>
> dma->dma_address += offset;
> @@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static int s390_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> s390_dma_unmap_pages(dev, sg_dma_address(s), sg_dma_len(s),
> dir, attrs);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void s390_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
So the error codes we return are -ENOMEM if allocating a DMA
translation entry fails and -EINVAL if the DMA translation table hasn't
been initialized or the caller tries to map 0 sized memory. Are these
error codes that you would expect? If yes then this change looks good
to me.
Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists