[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210716063332.GD13345@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:33:32 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 16/16] dma-mapping: Disallow .map_sg operations from
returning zero on error
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:45:44AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ static int __dma_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> else
> ents = ops->map_sg(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
>
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(ents == 0);
Turns this into a negative error code while we're at it, just to keep
the callers sane?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists