lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:10:34 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org, leo.yan@...aro.org, al.grant@....com, branislav.rankov@....com, denik@...omium.org, suzuki.poulose@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf cs-etm: Split --dump-raw-trace by AUX records Em Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:33:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: > Hi Arnaldo, > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:45:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu: > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 05:43:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote: > > > > for example: > > > > > > > > Idx:808; ID:1c; I_BAD_SEQUENCE : Invalid Sequence in packet.[I_ASYNC] > > > > ... > > > > PKTP_ETMV4I_0016 : 0x0014 (OCSD_ERR_INVALID_PCKT_HDR) [Invalid packet header]; TrcIdx=822 > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com> > > > > --- > > > > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> > > > > > > > > Thanks, applied. > > This patch is the second of a two patch series[1][2]. The first one was applied and > is in Linus' current master branch. But I can't find the second one in > either your core branch or Linus', and that despite your reply above that it has been > applied. As such I am guessing something went wrong with the process. > > How do you want to proceed - should we resend the second patch[2] or you still > have it somewhere in your Inbox? My bad, its no in tmp.perf/urgent, after testing together with other patches will move to perf/urgent and by the end of this week I'll submit it to Linus, sorry. - Arnaldo > Thanks, > Mathieu > > [1]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006575.html > [2]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006576.html > > > > > - Arnaldo > > -- - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists