[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210720151543.GA2296792@p14s>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:15:43 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, al.grant@....com, branislav.rankov@....com,
denik@...omium.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf cs-etm: Split --dump-raw-trace by AUX records
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:10:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:33:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:45:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 05:43:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > > > > for example:
> > > > >
> > > > > Idx:808; ID:1c; I_BAD_SEQUENCE : Invalid Sequence in packet.[I_ASYNC]
> > > > > ...
> > > > > PKTP_ETMV4I_0016 : 0x0014 (OCSD_ERR_INVALID_PCKT_HDR) [Invalid packet header]; TrcIdx=822
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, applied.
> >
> > This patch is the second of a two patch series[1][2]. The first one was applied and
> > is in Linus' current master branch. But I can't find the second one in
> > either your core branch or Linus', and that despite your reply above that it has been
> > applied. As such I am guessing something went wrong with the process.
> >
> > How do you want to proceed - should we resend the second patch[2] or you still
> > have it somewhere in your Inbox?
>
> My bad, its no in tmp.perf/urgent, after testing together with other
> patches will move to perf/urgent and by the end of this week I'll submit
> it to Linus, sorry.
>
Very good - thanks for the follow up.
> - Arnaldo
>
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > [1]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006575.html
> > [2]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006576.html
> >
> > >
> > > - Arnaldo
> > >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists