| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:15:19 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for RZ/G2L family
Hi Geert,
Thank you for the review.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:31 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:39 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > CANFD block on RZ/G2L SoC is almost identical to one found on
> > R-Car Gen3 SoC's. On RZ/G2L SoC interrupt sources for each channel
> > are split into different sources and the IP doesn't divide (1/2)
> > CANFD clock within the IP.
> >
> > This patch adds compatible string for RZ/G2L family and registers
> > the irq handlers required for CANFD operation. IRQ numbers are now
> > fetched based on names instead of indices. For backward compatibility
> > on non RZ/G2L SoC's we fallback reading based on indices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> > @@ -37,9 +37,15 @@
> > #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> >
> > #define RCANFD_DRV_NAME "rcar_canfd"
> >
> > +enum rcanfd_chip_id {
> > + RENESAS_RCAR_GEN3 = 0,
> > + RENESAS_RZG2L,
> > +};
> > +
> > /* Global register bits */
> >
> > /* RSCFDnCFDGRMCFG */
> > @@ -513,6 +519,9 @@ struct rcar_canfd_global {
> > enum rcar_canfd_fcanclk fcan; /* CANFD or Ext clock */
> > unsigned long channels_mask; /* Enabled channels mask */
> > bool fdmode; /* CAN FD or Classical CAN only mode */
> > + struct reset_control *rstc1; /* Pointer to reset source1 */
> > + struct reset_control *rstc2; /* Pointer to reset source2 */
>
> Are these comments helpful? IMHO they're stating the obvious.
>
No :D will drop those.
> > + enum rcanfd_chip_id chip_id;
> > };
> >
> > /* CAN FD mode nominal rate constants */
> > @@ -1577,6 +1586,45 @@ static int rcar_canfd_channel_probe(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv, u32 ch,
> > priv->can.clock.freq = fcan_freq;
> > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "can_clk rate is %u\n", priv->can.clock.freq);
> >
> > + if (gpriv->chip_id == RENESAS_RZG2L) {
> > + char *irq_name;
> > + int err_irq;
> > + int tx_irq;
> > +
> > + err_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, ch == 0 ? "can0_error" : "can1_error");
> > + if (err_irq < 0) {
> > + err = err_irq;
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, ch == 0 ? "can0_tx" : "can1_tx");
> > + if (tx_irq < 0) {
> > + err = tx_irq;
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + irq_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> > + "canfd.chnerr%d", ch);
>
> if (!irq_name) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto fail;
> }
>
> > + err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, err_irq,
> > + rcar_canfd_channel_interrupt, 0,
> > + irq_name, gpriv);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_request_irq CH Err(%d) failed, error %d\n",
> > + err_irq, err);
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > + irq_name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> > + "canfd.chntx%d", ch);
>
> Likewise.
>
> > + err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, tx_irq,
> > + rcar_canfd_channel_interrupt, 0,
> > + irq_name, gpriv);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_request_irq Tx (%d) failed, error %d\n",
> > + tx_irq, err);
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (gpriv->fdmode) {
> > priv->can.bittiming_const = &rcar_canfd_nom_bittiming_const;
> > priv->can.data_bittiming_const =
>
> > @@ -1649,27 +1700,64 @@ static int rcar_canfd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (of_child && of_device_is_available(of_child))
> > channels_mask |= BIT(1); /* Channel 1 */
> >
> > - ch_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > - if (ch_irq < 0) {
> > - err = ch_irq;
> > - goto fail_dev;
> > - }
> > + if (chip_id == RENESAS_RCAR_GEN3) {
> > + ch_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ch_int");
>
> platform_get_irq_byname_optional()?
> Unless you want to urge people to update their DTB.
>
Good point will change it to platform_get_irq_byname_optional().
> > + if (ch_irq < 0) {
> > + /* For backward compatibility get irq by index */
> > + ch_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (ch_irq < 0)
> > + return ch_irq;
> > + }
> >
> > - g_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > - if (g_irq < 0) {
> > - err = g_irq;
> > - goto fail_dev;
> > + g_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "g_int");
>
> Likewise,
>
agreed
Cheers,
Prabhakar
> > + if (g_irq < 0) {
> > + /* For backward compatibility get irq by index */
> > + g_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > + if (g_irq < 0)
> > + return g_irq;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + g_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "g_error");
> > + if (g_irq < 0)
> > + return g_irq;
> > +
> > + g_rx_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "g_rx_fifo");
> > + if (g_rx_irq < 0)
> > + return g_rx_irq;
> > }
> >
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists