linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP CAAM-based trusted keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:19:56 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        kernel <kernel@...gutronix.de>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        horia geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
        aymen sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Udit Agarwal <udit.agarwal@....com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Jan Luebbe <j.luebbe@...gutronix.de>,
        david <david@...ma-star.at>,
        Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        "open list, ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KEYS: trusted: Introduce support for NXP
 CAAM-based trusted keys

On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 2:37 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > Both is possible. If the string starts with "0x" it needs to be decoded to a
> > 128 bit key. Otherwise it has to be a up to 16 byte string.
>
> Fine by me. Looking forward to your patches. :-)

I'm not sure how to proceed.  Should I base my changes on this series
or do you plan to send an updated
version soon?
Maybe it makes also sense to base my DCP patch set on yours.

Trusted Keys maintainers, what do you prefer?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard