[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0fB48uES77a+z=OyyV9Rd4HbA4Q7gkVFCtPV5yispGYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:55:07 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@...wei.com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Henry Styles <hes@...ive.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Wesley Sheng <wesley.sheng@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/10] PCI: kirin: Allow building it as a module
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:15 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> There's nothing preventing this driver to be loaded as a
> module. So, change its config from bool to tristate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
No objections from me, but I wonder if you would also consider making the
module removable. It's currently marked as 'builtin_platform_driver',
so you can load but not remove it. Rob has done some bug fixes that make
it possible to remove similar drivers, so it's probably not much work
here either.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists