[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9ec812b4be57e32246735ca2f5e9560@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:28:01 -0700
From: khsieh@...eaurora.org
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, abhinavk@...eaurora.org,
aravindh@...eaurora.org, rsubbia@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/dp_mst: Fix return code on sideband message
failure
On 2021-07-22 10:53, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 15:24 -0700, khsieh@...eaurora.org wrote:
>> On 2021-07-07 01:37, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > On Tue, 06 Jul 2021, Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> > > From: Rajkumar Subbiah <rsubbia@...eaurora.org>
>> > >
>> > > Commit 2f015ec6eab6 ("drm/dp_mst: Add sideband down request tracing +
>> > > selftests") added some debug code for sideband message tracing. But
>> > > it seems to have unintentionally changed the behavior on sideband
>> > > message
>> > > failure. It catches and returns failure only if DRM_UT_DP is enabled.
>> > > Otherwise it ignores the error code and returns success. So on an MST
>> > > unplug, the caller is unaware that the clear payload message failed
>> > > and
>> > > ends up waiting for 4 seconds for the response. Fixes the issue by
>> > > returning the proper error code.
>> > >
>> > > Changes in V2:
>> > > -- Revise commit text as review comment
>> > > -- add Fixes text
>> > >
>> > > Changes in V3:
>> > > -- remove "unlikely" optimization
>> > >
>> > > Fixes: 2f015ec6eab6 ("drm/dp_mst: Add sideband down request tracing +
>> > > selftests")
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Subbiah <rsubbia@...eaurora.org>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>
>> > >
>> > > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > > ---
>> Lyude,
>> Any comments from you?
>> Thanks,
>
> Hey! Sorry did I forget to respond to this?
>
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
>
It looks like this patch is good to go (mainlined).
Anything needed from me to do?
Thanks,
>>
>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 10 ++++++----
>> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> > > index 1590144..df91110 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> > > @@ -2887,11 +2887,13 @@ static int process_single_tx_qlock(struct
>> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> > > idx += tosend + 1;
>> > >
>> > > ret = drm_dp_send_sideband_msg(mgr, up, chunk, idx);
>> > > - if (unlikely(ret) && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP)) {
>> > > - struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX);
>> > > + if (ret) {
>> > > + if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP)) {
>> > > + struct drm_printer p =
>> > > drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX);
>> > >
>> > > - drm_printf(&p, "sideband msg failed to send\n");
>> > > - drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
>> > > + drm_printf(&p, "sideband msg failed to send\n");
>> > > + drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg);
>> > > + }
>> > > return ret;
>> > > }
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists