[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e494c34c-1118-584f-a001-2929df747f8b@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:34:37 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A shift-out-of-bounds in minix_statfs in fs/minix/inode.c
On 7/22/21 2:58 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
...
>
> So I do care about this for ext4, although I don't guarantee immediate
> response, as it's something that I usually end up doing on my own
> time. I do get cranky that Syzkaller makes it painful to extract out
> the fuzzed file system image, and I much prefer those fuzzing systems
> which provide the file system image and the C program used to trigger
> the failre as two seprate files. Or failing that, if there was some
gosh yes. I have added a patch to the syzkaller C reproducer multiple times
so that it would write out the fs image and then I could just use that
with 'mount' etc. instead of running the (unreadable) C reproducer.
> trivial way to get the syzkaller reproducer program to disgorge the
> file system image to a specified output file. As a result, if I have
> a choice of spending time investigating fuzzing report from a more
> file-system friendly fuzzing program and syzkaller, I'll tend choose
> to spend my time dealing with other file system fuzzing reports first.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists