linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:29:43 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linyu Yuan <linyyuan@...eaurora.org>,
        Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current
 tree

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 02:12:28PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   40edb52298df ("usb: dwc3: avoid NULL access of usb_gadget_driver")
> 
> from the usb.current tree and commit:
> 
>   9f607a309fbe ("usb: dwc3: Resize TX FIFOs to meet EP bursting requirements")
> 
> from the usb tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks, I'll fix this up when Linus takes my usb-linus branch soon.

greg k-h