[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bee5718-eb3c-3563-9736-287584fed949@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:28:38 -0700
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 00/32] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack
On 7/22/2021 2:08 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/22/21 1:51 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> Linux distributions with CET are available now, and Intel processors with CET
>> are already on the market. It would be nice if CET support can be accepted
>> into the kernel.
>>
>> Changes in v28:
>> - Rebase to Linus tree v5.14-rc2.
>> - Patch #1: Update Document to indicate no-user-shstk also disables IBT.
>> - Patch #23: Update shstk_setup() with wrmsrl_safe(). Update return value.
>> - Patch #25: Split out copy_thread() changes. Add support for old clone().
>> Add comments.
>> - Add comments for get_xsave_addr() (Patch #25, #26).
>
> Could you characterize where this whole thing is?
>
> Are we at the point where the feedback is slowing down? What kind of
> feedback are you getting? How stable is the ABI versus the last revision?
>
The ABI has not changed since last version, except the addition of
shadow stack support for legacy clone(). This does not de-stabilize the
ABI.
Looking back at recent feedback:
- Boris had given lots of comments on code flow, syntax, etc. Those are
all addressed.
- Andy L. commented on the signal handling part, especially the
introduction of a ucontext extension. That is eliminated and now there
is the UC_WAIT_ENDBR flag.
- Kirill commented a few issues on mm patches. Those are addressed.
- Peter Z. requested splitting shadow stack and ibt. That is done.
As for running/testing of the series, overall it is stable.
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists