[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4cd9b79-6628-27b5-e06c-bd8034bc21da@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 10:30:26 -0700
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 25/32] x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack
On 7/22/2021 2:05 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/22/21 1:52 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> + if (!stack_size)
>> + stack_size = min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G);
>> +
>> + if (!shstk->size)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * For CLONE_VM, except vfork, the child needs a separate shadow
>> + * stack.
>> + */
>> + if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_VFORK | CLONE_VM)) != CLONE_VM)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This is in clone() syscall and fpu__copy() already copies xstates
>> + * from the parent. If get_xsave_addr() returns null, then XFEATURE_
>> + * CET_USER is still in init state, which certainly is an error.
>> + */
>> + state = get_xsave_addr(&tsk->thread.fpu.state.xsave, XFEATURE_CET_USER);
>> + if (!state)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> I don't care much for that comment.
>
> This code is meant to copy shadow stack config information into children
> when it is already enabled. We *just* checked for that above in the
> "shstk->size" check. The fact that this is called from clone() is
> irrelevant. The shadow stack enabling status *is*.
>
> I think I'd rather this be more along the lines of:
>
> /*
> * 'tsk' is configured with a shadow stack and the fpu.state is
> * up to date since it was just copied from the parent. There
> * must be a valid non-init CET state location in the buffer.
> */
>
> There is also a strong enough assumption violation that I'd probably
> WARN() in addition to returning -EINVAL.
>
Yes, I will update the comment and put in the WARN().
Thanks,
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists