linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YP7zn8n8wpSW4Gek@kunai>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:40:47 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled
 clocks enabled clocks


> AFAICT in practice it's a mandatory requirement in I²C subsys (in the
> past you hadn't accepted a patch from us without a tag from the
> maintainer) which makes it equal to sending PR by a maintainer. PR

Right. I require a tag from the driver maintainer.

> makes less burden since subsys maintainer don't need to run many tools
> or a tool many times to get the pile of patches.

I had driver maintainers who found it difficult to have a public tree to
pull from or forgot how to send properly prepared pull requests. They
were happy to send Rev-by, though. And I am happy with that, too. At
least in I2C, picking up patches is small work compared to the actual
review.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)