linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:28:49 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...iqon.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled
 clocks enabled clocks

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:33 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> > The idea is that you will send a PR to CCF maintainers instead of
> > patches, although it's expected that patches appear in the mailing
> > list beforehand anyway.
>
> Depends a little. For me, a Rev-by from the driver maintainer is enough,
> and I'll pick them. That lowers the burden on the drivers maintainer
> side. May not work for high volumes of patches, but for I2C this works
> enough.

AFAICT in practice it's a mandatory requirement in I²C subsys (in the
past you hadn't accepted a patch from us without a tag from the
maintainer) which makes it equal to sending PR by a maintainer. PR
makes less burden since subsys maintainer don't need to run many tools
or a tool many times to get the pile of patches.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko