linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled clocks enabled clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:32:54 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        sboyd@...nel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        a.zummo@...ertech.it, mturquette@...libre.com,
        Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        o.rempel@...gutronix.de, Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        aardelean@...iqon.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PULL] Add variants of devm_clk_get for prepared and enabled
 clocks enabled clocks


> The idea is that you will send a PR to CCF maintainers instead of
> patches, although it's expected that patches appear in the mailing
> list beforehand anyway.

Depends a little. For me, a Rev-by from the driver maintainer is enough,
and I'll pick them. That lowers the burden on the drivers maintainer
side. May not work for high volumes of patches, but for I2C this works
enough.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)