linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Linux RISC-V ACLINT Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:31:01 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Linux RISC-V ACLINT Support

Hi Marc,

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 8:02 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:45:20 +0100,
> Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marc,
> >
> > I have taken the approach of IPI domains (like you suggested) in this series.
> >
> > What do you think ?
>
> I have commented on the irqchip driver.
>
> As for the RISC-V specific code, I'll let the architecture maintainers
> look into it. I guess the elephant in the room is that this spec seems
> to be evolving, and that there is no HW implementation (how this
> driver maps on SF's CLINT is anybody's guess).

The SiFive CLINT is a more convoluted device and provides M-level
timer functionality and M-level IPI functionality in one MMIO device.

The RISC-V ACLINT specification is more modular and backward
compatible with the SiFive CLINT. In fact, a SiFive CLINT device
can be viewed as a ACLINT MSWI device + ACLINT MTIMER device.
This means existing RISC-V boards having SiFive CLINT will be
automatically compliant to the RISC-V ACLINT specification.

Here's the RISC-V ACLINT spec:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aclint/blob/main/riscv-aclint.adoc

The RISC-V ACLINT spec is quite stable and we are not seeing any
further changes hence I sent out RFC PATCHes to get feedback. The
RISC-V ACLINT spec will be frozen before 2021 end (i.e. before next
RISC-V summit).

The Linux NoMMU kernel (M-level) will use an ACLINT MSWI device
for IPI support whereas the regular Linux MMU kernel (S-level) will
use an ACLINT SSWI device for IPI support.

The ACLINT SWI driver is a common IPI driver for both ACLINT
MSWI (Linux NoMMU) and ACLINT SSWI (Linux MMU). In fact,
the ACLINT SWI also works for IPI part (i.e. MSWI) of SiFive CLINT.

Regards,
Anup

>
>         M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.