linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Linux RISC-V ACLINT Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:32:45 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Linux RISC-V ACLINT Support

On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:45:20 +0100,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> I have taken the approach of IPI domains (like you suggested) in this series.
> 
> What do you think ?

I have commented on the irqchip driver.

As for the RISC-V specific code, I'll let the architecture maintainers
look into it. I guess the elephant in the room is that this spec seems
to be evolving, and that there is no HW implementation (how this
driver maps on SF's CLINT is anybody's guess).

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.