lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:15:06 -0700
From:   Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        opensource@...rst.com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
        git@...nthomson.fastmail.com.au, neil@...wn.name, hofrat@...dl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] gpiolib: convert 'devprop_gpiochip_set_names' to
 support multiple gpiochip banks per device

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:20 AM Sergio Paracuellos
<sergio.paracuellos@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The default gpiolib-of implementation does not work with the multiple
> gpiochip banks per device structure used for example by the gpio-mt7621
> and gpio-brcmstb drivers. To fix these kind of situations driver code
> is forced to fill the names to avoid the gpiolib code to set names
> repeated along the banks. Instead of continue with that antipattern
> fix the gpiolib core function to get expected behaviour for every
> single situation adding a field 'offset' in the gpiochip structure.
> Doing in this way, we can assume this offset will be zero for normal
> driver code where only one gpiochip bank per device is used but
> can be set explicitly in those drivers that really need more than
> one gpiochip.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

One minor comment below, then this looks great:
Reviewed-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>

> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 27c07108496d..84ed4b73fa3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -382,10 +382,18 @@ static int devprop_gpiochip_set_names(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>         if (count < 0)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       if (count > gdev->ngpio) {
> -               dev_warn(&gdev->dev, "gpio-line-names is length %d but should be at most length %d",
> -                        count, gdev->ngpio);
> -               count = gdev->ngpio;
> +       /*
> +        * When offset is set in the driver side we assume the driver internally
> +        * is using more than one gpiochip per the same device. We have to stop
> +        * setting friendly names if the specified ones with 'gpio-line-names'
> +        * are less than the offset in the device itself. This means all the
> +        * lines are not present for every single pin within all the internal
> +        * gpiochips.
> +        */
> +       if (count <= chip->offset) {
> +               dev_warn(&gdev->dev, "gpio-line-names too short (length %d) cannot map names for the gpiochip at offset %u\n",

nit: there should be some punctuation after "(length %d)", otherwise
with parentheticals removed it reads as

"gpio-line-names too short cannot map names ..."

but we need to provide a space between these thoughts for clarity.  A
comma should be ok:

"gpio-line-names too short (length %d), cannot map names ..."

Best regards,
Gregory

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ