[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9827144a-dacf-61dc-d554-6c69434708de@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:31:03 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY
On 7/27/21 1:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> +static int __init test_memcpy_init(void)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + err |= test_memcpy();
> + err |= test_memmove();
> + err |= test_memset();
> +
> + if (err) {
> + pr_warn("FAIL!\n");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + pr_info("all tests passed\n");
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit test_memcpy_exit(void)
> +{ }
> +
> +module_init(test_memcpy_init);
> +module_exit(test_memcpy_exit);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Has it been considered to implement this test using the Kunit framework?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists