linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <afa92312-a667-3597-d937-7e09bac2bb29@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:33:30 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY

On 7/27/21 4:31 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/27/21 1:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> +static int __init test_memcpy_init(void)
>> +{
>> +    int err = 0;
>> +
>> +    err |= test_memcpy();
>> +    err |= test_memmove();
>> +    err |= test_memset();
>> +
>> +    if (err) {
>> +        pr_warn("FAIL!\n");
>> +        err = -EINVAL;
>> +    } else {
>> +        pr_info("all tests passed\n");
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __exit test_memcpy_exit(void)
>> +{ }
>> +
>> +module_init(test_memcpy_init);
>> +module_exit(test_memcpy_exit);
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> Has it been considered to implement this test using the Kunit framework?

and do we want everything converted to use the Kunit test framework?

My answer is No, we don't, but I could easily be in the minority.

-- 
~Randy