lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:56:25 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition
 type

On 7/27/21 7:42 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:18:31AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=TBD
>>
>> commit 994fb794cb252edd124a46ca0994e37a4726a100
>> Author: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>> Date:   Sat, 19 Jun 2021 13:28:19 -0400
>>
>>      cgroup/cpuset: Add a new isolated cpus.partition type
>>
>>      Cpuset v1 uses the sched_load_balance control file to determine if load
>>      balancing should be enabled.  Cpuset v2 gets rid of sched_load_balance
>>      as its use may require disabling load balancing at cgroup root.
>>
>>      For workloads that require very low latency like DPDK, the latency
>>      jitters caused by periodic load balancing may exceed the desired
>>      latency limit.
>>
>>      When cpuset v2 is in use, the only way to avoid this latency cost is to
>>      use the "isolcpus=" kernel boot option to isolate a set of CPUs. After
>>      the kernel boot, however, there is no way to add or remove CPUs from
>>      this isolated set. For workloads that are more dynamic in nature, that
>>      means users have to provision enough CPUs for the worst case situation
>>      resulting in excess idle CPUs.
>>
>>      To address this issue for cpuset v2, a new cpuset.cpus.partition type
>>      "isolated" is added which allows the creation of a cpuset partition
>>      without load balancing. This will allow system administrators to
>>      dynamically adjust the size of isolated partition to the current need
>>      of the workload without rebooting the system.
>>
>>      Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Nice! And while we are adding a new ABI, can we take advantage of that and
> add a specific semantic that if a new isolated partition matches a subset of
> "isolcpus=", it automatically maps to it. This means that any further
> modification to that isolated partition will also modify the associated
> isolcpus= subset.
>
> Or to summarize, when we create a new isolated partition, remove the associated
> CPUs from isolcpus= ?

We can certainly do that as a follow-on. Another idea that I have been 
thinking about is to automatically generating a isolated partition under 
root to match the given isolcpus parameter when the v2 filesystem is 
mounted. That needs more experimentation and testing to verify that it 
can work.

Cheers,
Longman

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ