[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2306c0c4-1312-fcc7-1ed3-406fbd72cf63@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:44:42 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm tree with the drm-next
tree
Hi Mark,
Am 29.07.21 um 13:10 schrieb Mark Brown:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 60f800b2bdfa ("drm/msm: always wait for the exclusive fence")
>
> from the drm-next tree and commit:
>
> 1d8a5ca436ee ("drm/msm: Conversion to drm scheduler")
>
> from the drm-msm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index 39c35414d7b5,5db07fc287ad..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
thanks for the fixup, but something went wrong here. The diff is just empty.
Any idea what's going on?
Regards,
Christian.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists