[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <108872.1627528448@turing-police>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:14:08 -0400
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@...il.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, pavel@....cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] block: Add block device LED trigger list
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:53:38 -0500, Ian Pilcher said:
> * New config option (CONFIG_BLK_LED_TRIGGERS) to enable/disable
> block device LED triggers
>
> * New file - block/blk-ledtrig.c
Is this bisect-clean (as in "will it build properly with that config option
set after each of the succeeding patches")? Usually, the config option
is added in the *last* patch, so that even if you have a bisect issue
it won't manifest because it's wrapped in a '#ifdef CONFIG_WHATEVER'
that can't possibly be compiled in because there's no way for Kconfig
to set that variable.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists