[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <110419.1627530334@turing-police>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:45:34 -0400
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@...il.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, pavel@....cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] block: Add kernel APIs to create & delete block device LED triggers
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 20:53:39 -0500, Ian Pilcher said:
> * New file - include/linux/blk-ledtrig.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@...il.com>
> ---
> block/blk-ledtrig.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/blk-ledtrig.h | 19 +++++
> 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/blk-ledtrig.h
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-ledtrig.c b/block/blk-ledtrig.c
> index 345a3b6bdbc6..c69ea1539336 100644
> --- a/block/blk-ledtrig.c
> +++ b/block/blk-ledtrig.c
> +
> +static int __blk_ledtrig_create(const char *const name, const size_t len)
(...)
+ if (blk_ledtrig_find(name, len) != NULL) {
+ pr_warn("blockdev LED trigger named %.*s already exists\n",
+ (int)len, name);
Is pr_warn() the right level for this stuff? I'd think this sort of pilot error should
be pr_info() or even pr_debug(), if mentioned at all. pr_warn() would be for
something like an unexpected situation like trying to blink an LED but failing.
Simple syntax errors should probably just toss a -EINVAL and return.
(Among other things, this allows a userspace script to spam the
log by simply repeatedly trying to create the same entry)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists