linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nosmall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 31 Jul 2021 07:48:20 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao.yu@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nosmall_discard mount option

On 2021/7/31 7:41, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/7/31 2:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> how about adding "discard_gran=[small|segment|section]", and keeping discard_map
>> in the small case only? And, I think we should set the section mode for zoned
>> device automatically.
> 
> Yup, better,
> 
> About the naming, it look discard_gran is not clear here, since there is another
> sysfs entry /sys/fs/f2fs/<devname>/discard_granularity has the same name, and
> also semantics of newly added mount option is not only control the smallest discard
> size, but also indicate discard start offset should be aligned to segment or section.
> So how about using: "aligned_discard=[none|segment|section]" instead?

Maybe: "aligned_discard=[block|segment|section]"?

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>