linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nosmall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 17:42:56 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao.yu@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nosmall_discard mount option

On 07/31, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/7/31 7:41, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2021/7/31 2:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > how about adding "discard_gran=[small|segment|section]", and keeping discard_map
> > > in the small case only? And, I think we should set the section mode for zoned
> > > device automatically.
> > 
> > Yup, better,
> > 
> > About the naming, it look discard_gran is not clear here, since there is another
> > sysfs entry /sys/fs/f2fs/<devname>/discard_granularity has the same name, and
> > also semantics of newly added mount option is not only control the smallest discard
> > size, but also indicate discard start offset should be aligned to segment or section.
> > So how about using: "aligned_discard=[none|segment|section]" instead?
> 
> Maybe: "aligned_discard=[block|segment|section]"?

How about discard_unit? I feel that issuing discards in one of those unit
indicate the offset.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >