[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe768d28-db69-707a-0f95-4f1bf9f48b1e@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 08:48:16 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao.yu@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nosmall_discard mount option
On 2021/7/31 8:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 07/31, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2021/7/31 7:41, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2021/7/31 2:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> how about adding "discard_gran=[small|segment|section]", and keeping discard_map
>>>> in the small case only? And, I think we should set the section mode for zoned
>>>> device automatically.
>>>
>>> Yup, better,
>>>
>>> About the naming, it look discard_gran is not clear here, since there is another
>>> sysfs entry /sys/fs/f2fs/<devname>/discard_granularity has the same name, and
>>> also semantics of newly added mount option is not only control the smallest discard
>>> size, but also indicate discard start offset should be aligned to segment or section.
>>> So how about using: "aligned_discard=[none|segment|section]" instead?
>>
>> Maybe: "aligned_discard=[block|segment|section]"?
>
> How about discard_unit? I feel that issuing discards in one of those unit
> indicate the offset.
Looks fine to me, let me update the patch.
Thanks,
>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists