lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:01:31 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
        vbadigan@...eaurora.org, rampraka@...eaurora.org,
        sayalil@...eaurora.org, sartgarg@...eaurora.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, cang@...eaurora.org,
        pragalla@...eaurora.org, nitirawa@...eaurora.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Update the software timeout value for sdhc

Quoting Shaik Sajida Bhanu (2021-07-16 04:46:14)
> Whenever SDHC run at clock rate 50MHZ or below, the hardware data
> timeout value will be 21.47secs, which is approx. 22secs and we have
> a current software timeout value as 10secs. We have to set software
> timeout value more than the hardware data timeout value to avioid seeing
> the below register dumps.
>
> [  332.953670] mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
> [  332.959608] mmc2: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
> [  332.966450] mmc2: sdhci: Sys addr:  0x00000000 | Version:  0x00007202
> [  332.973256] mmc2: sdhci: Blk size:  0x00000200 | Blk cnt:  0x00000001
> [  332.980054] mmc2: sdhci: Argument:  0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000027
> [  332.986864] mmc2: sdhci: Present:   0x01f801f6 | Host ctl: 0x0000001f
> [  332.993671] mmc2: sdhci: Power:     0x00000001 | Blk gap:  0x00000000
> [  333.000583] mmc2: sdhci: Wake-up:   0x00000000 | Clock:    0x00000007
> [  333.007386] mmc2: sdhci: Timeout:   0x0000000e | Int stat: 0x00000000
> [  333.014182] mmc2: sdhci: Int enab:  0x03ff100b | Sig enab: 0x03ff100b
> [  333.020976] mmc2: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
> [  333.027771] mmc2: sdhci: Caps:      0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1:   0x0000808f
> [  333.034561] mmc2: sdhci: Cmd:       0x0000183a | Max curr: 0x00000000
> [  333.041359] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[0]:   0x00000900 | Resp[1]:  0x00000000
> [  333.048157] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[2]:   0x00000000 | Resp[3]:  0x00000000
> [  333.054945] mmc2: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
> [  333.059657] mmc2: sdhci: ADMA Err:  0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr:
> 0x0000000ffffff218
> [  333.067178] mmc2: sdhci_msm: ----------- VENDOR REGISTER DUMP
> -----------
> [  333.074343] mmc2: sdhci_msm: DLL sts: 0x00000000 | DLL cfg:
> 0x6000642c | DLL cfg2: 0x0020a000
> [  333.083417] mmc2: sdhci_msm: DLL cfg3: 0x00000000 | DLL usr ctl:
> 0x00000000 | DDR cfg: 0x80040873
> [  333.092850] mmc2: sdhci_msm: Vndr func: 0x00008a9c | Vndr func2 :
> 0xf88218a8 Vndr func3: 0x02626040
> [  333.102371] mmc2: sdhci: ============================================
>
> So, set software timeout value more than hardware timeout value.
>

Should this be tagged for stable trees?

> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since V3:
>         - Addressed minor comments from Adrain Hunter and retained his
>           Acked-by Signed-off.
>
> Changes since V2:
>         - Updated 22 with 22LL to avoid compiler warning as
>           suggested by Adrian Hunter.
>         - Added a check to update software data timeout value if its value
>           is less than the calculated hardware data timeout value as suggested
>           by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.
> Changes since V1:
>         - Moved software data timeout update part to qcom specific file
>           as suggested by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ