[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53tzuU-1Gb+krJKjJ5k=hmeBex1=qmJO+zLZBCL5DBhWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:01:31 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
vbadigan@...eaurora.org, rampraka@...eaurora.org,
sayalil@...eaurora.org, sartgarg@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, cang@...eaurora.org,
pragalla@...eaurora.org, nitirawa@...eaurora.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Update the software timeout value for sdhc
Quoting Shaik Sajida Bhanu (2021-07-16 04:46:14)
> Whenever SDHC run at clock rate 50MHZ or below, the hardware data
> timeout value will be 21.47secs, which is approx. 22secs and we have
> a current software timeout value as 10secs. We have to set software
> timeout value more than the hardware data timeout value to avioid seeing
> the below register dumps.
>
> [ 332.953670] mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.
> [ 332.959608] mmc2: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
> [ 332.966450] mmc2: sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00007202
> [ 332.973256] mmc2: sdhci: Blk size: 0x00000200 | Blk cnt: 0x00000001
> [ 332.980054] mmc2: sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000027
> [ 332.986864] mmc2: sdhci: Present: 0x01f801f6 | Host ctl: 0x0000001f
> [ 332.993671] mmc2: sdhci: Power: 0x00000001 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
> [ 333.000583] mmc2: sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000007
> [ 333.007386] mmc2: sdhci: Timeout: 0x0000000e | Int stat: 0x00000000
> [ 333.014182] mmc2: sdhci: Int enab: 0x03ff100b | Sig enab: 0x03ff100b
> [ 333.020976] mmc2: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
> [ 333.027771] mmc2: sdhci: Caps: 0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x0000808f
> [ 333.034561] mmc2: sdhci: Cmd: 0x0000183a | Max curr: 0x00000000
> [ 333.041359] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[0]: 0x00000900 | Resp[1]: 0x00000000
> [ 333.048157] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[2]: 0x00000000 | Resp[3]: 0x00000000
> [ 333.054945] mmc2: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
> [ 333.059657] mmc2: sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr:
> 0x0000000ffffff218
> [ 333.067178] mmc2: sdhci_msm: ----------- VENDOR REGISTER DUMP
> -----------
> [ 333.074343] mmc2: sdhci_msm: DLL sts: 0x00000000 | DLL cfg:
> 0x6000642c | DLL cfg2: 0x0020a000
> [ 333.083417] mmc2: sdhci_msm: DLL cfg3: 0x00000000 | DLL usr ctl:
> 0x00000000 | DDR cfg: 0x80040873
> [ 333.092850] mmc2: sdhci_msm: Vndr func: 0x00008a9c | Vndr func2 :
> 0xf88218a8 Vndr func3: 0x02626040
> [ 333.102371] mmc2: sdhci: ============================================
>
> So, set software timeout value more than hardware timeout value.
>
Should this be tagged for stable trees?
> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <sbhanu@...eaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since V3:
> - Addressed minor comments from Adrain Hunter and retained his
> Acked-by Signed-off.
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Updated 22 with 22LL to avoid compiler warning as
> suggested by Adrian Hunter.
> - Added a check to update software data timeout value if its value
> is less than the calculated hardware data timeout value as suggested
> by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.
> Changes since V1:
> - Moved software data timeout update part to qcom specific file
> as suggested by Veerabhadrarao Badiganti.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists