[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:26:06 +0800
From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
"intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support
On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks a lot for this effort!
>
> Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash
> with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go
> through the vfio tree?
>
I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part
can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would first
merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending through
i915 tree.
Thanks
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists