linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1Ru-qawBWtbmfJm-jiPpJTRJ9zSufXHNCZvxt1RCMFBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Aug 2021 16:02:26 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:46 AM <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
> AT91 defconfig for 5.15:
>
> - add defconfig entries for new SoC: SAMA7G5
>   - dedicated sama7_defconfig to match the needed peripherals and
>     dependencies

I feel this needs  better description in the changelog: Why do you need another
defconfig file in addition to the existing sama5_defconfig? Are they so
different that a single config is not a good fit for both?

      Arnd