linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f5e8843-1a07-760a-db1a-aee084f00405@microchip.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:41:32 +0200
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>,
        SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: defconfig for 5.15

On 04/08/2021 at 16:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:46 AM <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
>> AT91 defconfig for 5.15:
>>
>> - add defconfig entries for new SoC: SAMA7G5
>>    - dedicated sama7_defconfig to match the needed peripherals and
>>      dependencies
> 
> I feel this needs  better description in the changelog: Why do you need another
> defconfig file in addition to the existing sama5_defconfig? Are they so
> different that a single config is not a good fit for both?

Hi Arnd,

I'm pushing another tag for this with better description. I hope it's 
convincing ;-)

Best regards,
   Nicolas

-- 
Nicolas Ferre