linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: Add ethernet0 to the aliases node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:55:56 +0800
From:   Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Lewis Hanly <lewis.hanly@...rochip.com>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Bin Meng <bin.meng@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: microchip: Add ethernet0 to the aliases node

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:55 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 04:34:02 PDT (-0700), geert@...ux-m68k.org wrote:
> > Hi Bin,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:14 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 3:44 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
> >> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
> >> > > @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ / {
> >> > >         model = "Microchip MPFS Icicle Kit";
> >> > >         compatible = "microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit";
> >> > >
> >> > > +       aliases {
> >> > > +               ethernet0 = &emac1;
> >> > > +       };
> >> > > +
> >> > >         chosen {
> >> > >         };
> >> >
> >> > This should be added to the board DTS (microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts)
> >> > instead.
> >>
> >> I was wondering the same thing before doing this, but when I checked
> >> all other DTS in arch/riscv/boot I found the aliases node is put in
> >> the SoC dtsi file instead of the board on so I think that's the
> >> convention.
> >
> > The numbering of the aliases is supposed to match the labels on the
> > board, hence it is board-specific, not SoC-specific.
> >
> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> >
> >                         Geert
>
> I don't see a v2 of this.

Will send v2 soon.

Regards,
Bin