[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35b2bd0f-5766-debd-2b4c-c642a85df367@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 14:49:30 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufshcd: Fix device links when BOOT WLUN
fails to probe
On 8/4/21 8:33 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Martin, perhaps you could consider picking up this patch if no one objects?
Since patch 1/2 went in through Greg's tree, if patch 2/2 goes upstream
via Martin's tree, will the resulting kernel be bisectable if Linus
pulls Martin's tree before he pulls Greg's tree?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists