[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1czqrguch.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 22:50:55 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] scsi: ufshcd: Fix device links when BOOT WLUN
fails to probe
> Since patch 1/2 went in through Greg's tree, if patch 2/2 goes
> upstream via Martin's tree, will the resulting kernel be bisectable if
> Linus pulls Martin's tree before he pulls Greg's tree?
Also, this patch will need to be rebased on top of 5.15/scsi-staging due
to all the UFS churn in this release.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists