[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v94k1dcd.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:54:10 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 30/63] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant
On Wed, Aug 04 2021 at 19:34, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 7/30/21 9:50 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> + * missed.
>> + *
>> + * - Non RT spin/rw_locks disable preemption and evtl. interrupts.
>
> "evtl."?
German abbreviation for eventually. Let me make that understandable for
non .de folks.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists