linux-kernel - Re: [patch 22/63] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sfzo1db9.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:54:50 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 22/63] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header

On Wed, Aug 04 2021 at 17:17, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 7/30/21 9:50 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>>   
>
> Most of the code in spinlock_types.h are moved into 
> spinlock_types_raw.h. However, macros like SPINLOCK_MAGIC and those that 
> followed are not removed from spinlock_types.h in this patch leading to 
> the same set of macro definitions in two different files. Should we 
> eliminate the duplicate macro definitions either from spinlock_types.h 
> or from spinlock_types_raw.h?

Right you are.