lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQuyUA4gq/6GZVps@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:41:36 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Artur Petrosyan <Arthur.Petrosyan@...opsys.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc2: rename DWC2_POWER_DOWN_PARAM_NONE state

On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 09:22:05AM +0000, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 8/5/2021 1:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:44:20PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> DWC2_POWER_DOWN_PARAM_NONE really means that the driver still uses clock
> >> gating to save power when hardware is not used. Rename the state name to
> >> DWC2_POWER_DOWN_PARAM_CLOCK_GATING to match the driver behavior.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> >> ---
> >> This is a follow-up of this discussion:
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/26099de1-826f-42bf-0de7-759a47faf4a0@samsung.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LG012E4LzO4qVgWZHu_3eTbZ5zmdI4qENHbOuuLwm-IlhHF9KKIaYyJNaY2vXeg$
> >>
> >> This should be applied on top of v5.14-rc3.
> > 
> > What else would I apply it on top of, we can't go back in time :)
> > 
> > Where is this needed for 5.14-final, or for 5.15-rc1?
> > 
> 
> I would prefer to apply to 5.14-final. Just I need 1 more day to 
> complete testing. Have I this additional day?

Sure, I'll drop this from my queue, please resubmit when you are ready
to have them reviewed/accepted.

Also, if these "fix" a previous patch, please put a "Fixes:" tag in the
patch so we know that.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ