[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c019443-6153-f059-418b-3b268750f7a8@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 11:43:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
'Rob Herring' <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: 'Chanwoo Choi' <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
'Pankaj Dubey' <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
'Sam Protsenko' <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
'Marc Zyngier' <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address
range on Exynos7
On 05/08/2021 11:26, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>> Sent: 05 August 2021 13:07
>> To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>; Chanwoo Choi
>> <cw00.choi@...sung.com>; Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>;
>> Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>; Marc Zyngier
>> <maz@...nel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address
>> range on Exynos7
>>
>> On 05/08/2021 09:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> The GIC-400 CPU interfaces address range is defined as 0x2000-0x3FFF
>>> (by ARM).
>>>
>>
> Looking at DDI0471B_gic400_r0p1_trm.pdf, CPU interface range is 0x0000 ~ 0x10000
>
>> I underestimated the issue - this is actually bug as there is a GICC_DIR
>> register at offset 0x1000. Therefore:
>>
> Looking at the exynos7 and exynos5433 UMs looks like GICC_DIR is at offset 0x2100 (from 0x1100_0000 GIC base)
> It is possible for you to cross check once?
>
That's a mistake in Exynos manual. GICC_DIR is at 0x1000:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0471/b/programmers-model/cpu-interface-register-summary
We have discussion here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/0277c701-cc25-cdc5-d3b9-cf2cc2ba4de5@canonical.com/T/#m1ced9a28bed27f5cf74e281fb68efe1b57d5609e
Range of 0x10000 is definitely wrong as it overlaps with two other
ranges.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists