lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Aug 2021 14:56:14 +0530
From:   "Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
To:     "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        "'Rob Herring'" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "'Chanwoo Choi'" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        "'Pankaj Dubey'" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
        "'Sam Protsenko'" <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
        "'Marc Zyngier'" <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address
 range on Exynos7

Hi Krzysztof,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> Sent: 05 August 2021 13:07
> To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>; Chanwoo Choi
> <cw00.choi@...sung.com>; Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>;
> Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>; Marc Zyngier
> <maz@...nel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address
> range on Exynos7
> 
> On 05/08/2021 09:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The GIC-400 CPU interfaces address range is defined as 0x2000-0x3FFF
> > (by ARM).
> >
> 
Looking at DDI0471B_gic400_r0p1_trm.pdf, CPU interface range is 0x0000 ~ 0x10000

> I underestimated the issue - this is actually bug as there is a GICC_DIR
> register at offset 0x1000. Therefore:
> 
Looking at the exynos7 and exynos5433 UMs looks like GICC_DIR is at offset 0x2100 (from 0x1100_0000 GIC base)
It is possible for you to cross check once?

> Fixes: b9024cbc937d ("arm64: dts: Add initial device tree support for
> exynos7")
> 
> > Reported-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> > Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> > index 8b06397ba6e7..c73a597ca66e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@...01000 {
> >  			#address-cells = <0>;
> >  			interrupt-controller;
> >  			reg =	<0x11001000 0x1000>,
> > -				<0x11002000 0x1000>,
> > +				<0x11002000 0x2000>,
> >  				<0x11004000 0x2000>,
> >  				<0x11006000 0x2000>;
> >  		};
> >
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ