[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35b0e2dc-0591-0a2f-8e3d-4177792a13fa@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 14:40:07 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] CAN: Add support for CAN in AM65,J721e and AM64
On 05.08.21 14:32, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/08/21 6:15 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 15:40-20210726, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>>> The following series of patches add support for CAN in SoC's AM65, J721e
>>> and AM64.
>>>
>>> This patch series is dependent on [1] and [2] and I have requested for an
>>> immutable tag from the Marc Kleine-Budde(maintainer of net tree).
>>>
>>> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1423048/
>>> [2] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg08108.html
>>>
>>> changes since v1 -
>>> - changed the message ram configuration to use the maximum value
>>> in each field, for better performance.
>>>
>>> Aswath Govindraju (3):
>>> arm64: dts: ti: am654-base-board: Disable mcan nodes
>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add support for MCAN
>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm/sk: Add support for main domain mcan
>>> nodes in EVM and disable them on SK
>>>
>>> Faiz Abbas (3):
>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu: Add Support for MCAN
>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Add support for MCAN nodes
>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support for mcu_mcan
>>> nodes
>>
>> I noticed in my checkup: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/zSk39M943N/
>> warnings with dtbs_check, I think the bindings need a little more help
>> here (please also notice the iot platform warnings getting introduced).
>>
>
> Jan,
>
> Can you please point me to the schematics for iot platform? Also, is CAN
> subsystem brought out on the iot platform boards?
Schematics aren't publicly available. If you have specific questions, I
may help, though.
CAN is not in use yet (not connected AFAIK).
Jan
>
>> Since we are still working on the bindings[1], lets clean that up
>> before we consider the dts addition. I suspect we need to cook this
>> more towards the next cycle.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1470806/
>>
>
> Nishanth,
>
> Sorry for not taking of this earlier. I'll try to get everything ready
> for next release.
>
> Thanks,
> Aswath
>
--
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists