[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd7df02-37ed-6286-0232-2e92bf1f67b4@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 18:14:07 +0530
From: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@...com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] CAN: Add support for CAN in AM65,J721e and AM64
Hi Jan,
On 05/08/21 6:10 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 05.08.21 14:32, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/08/21 6:15 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 15:40-20210726, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>>>> The following series of patches add support for CAN in SoC's AM65, J721e
>>>> and AM64.
>>>>
>>>> This patch series is dependent on [1] and [2] and I have requested for an
>>>> immutable tag from the Marc Kleine-Budde(maintainer of net tree).
>>>>
>>>> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1423048/
>>>> [2] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg08108.html
>>>>
>>>> changes since v1 -
>>>> - changed the message ram configuration to use the maximum value
>>>> in each field, for better performance.
>>>>
>>>> Aswath Govindraju (3):
>>>> arm64: dts: ti: am654-base-board: Disable mcan nodes
>>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add support for MCAN
>>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm/sk: Add support for main domain mcan
>>>> nodes in EVM and disable them on SK
>>>>
>>>> Faiz Abbas (3):
>>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu: Add Support for MCAN
>>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Add support for MCAN nodes
>>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support for mcu_mcan
>>>> nodes
>>>
>>> I noticed in my checkup: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/zSk39M943N/
>>> warnings with dtbs_check, I think the bindings need a little more help
>>> here (please also notice the iot platform warnings getting introduced).
>>>
>>
>> Jan,
>>
>> Can you please point me to the schematics for iot platform? Also, is CAN
>> subsystem brought out on the iot platform boards?
>
> Schematics aren't publicly available. If you have specific questions, I
> may help, though.
>
> CAN is not in use yet (not connected AFAIK).
>
Thank you for clarifying this. I will disable the CAN DT nodes in
k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi in my respin.
Thanks,
Aswath
> Jan
>
>>
>>> Since we are still working on the bindings[1], lets clean that up
>>> before we consider the dts addition. I suspect we need to cook this
>>> more towards the next cycle.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1470806/
>>>
>>
>> Nishanth,
>>
>> Sorry for not taking of this earlier. I'll try to get everything ready
>> for next release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aswath
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists