linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 20:28:35 +0100
From:   Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more
 sensibly


On 06/08/2021 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:10 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
>> against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
>> better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
>> function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
>> in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
>> endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
>> functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
>> commit.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> Daniel Scally (2):
>>   device property: Check fwnode->secondary in
>>     fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()
>>   Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id()
>>     for fwnode->secondary"
>>
>>  drivers/base/property.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> The series looks good to me, but can you please resend it with a CC to
> linux-acpi?


Yeah sure; I'll do that shortly