[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g1Udw1oyVSOBO1HefawDNSfHYbMK7=ggR0WKOCawCosg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:29:02 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:10 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
> against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
> better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
> function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
> in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
> endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
> functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
> commit.
>
> Thanks
> Dan
>
>
> Daniel Scally (2):
> device property: Check fwnode->secondary in
> fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()
> Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id()
> for fwnode->secondary"
>
> drivers/base/property.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
The series looks good to me, but can you please resend it with a CC to
linux-acpi?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists