linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:29:02 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more sensibly

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:10 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
> against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
> better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
> function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
> in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
> endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
> functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
> commit.
>
> Thanks
> Dan
>
>
> Daniel Scally (2):
>   device property: Check fwnode->secondary in
>     fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()
>   Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id()
>     for fwnode->secondary"
>
>  drivers/base/property.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

The series looks good to me, but can you please resend it with a CC to
linux-acpi?