linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <561628db-6155-8e31-6f07-3c7f18810e65@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:20:38 +0800
From:   Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@...el.com>,
        "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>,
        Robert Hoo <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control
 when setup VMCS config

On 8/6/2021 6:35 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021, Zeng Guang wrote:
>> +u64 vmx_tertiary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> Make this static and drop the declaration from vmx.h, there's no nested user (yet),
> and I'm also working on a patch to rework how prepare_vmcs02_early() gets KVMs
> desires without having to call these heleprs, i.e. I want to bury all of these in
> vmx.c.
OK. Thus it could be static.
>> +{
>> +	return vmcs_config.cpu_based_3rd_exec_ctrl;
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Adjust a single secondary execution control bit to intercept/allow an
>>    * instruction in the guest.  This is usually done based on whether or not a
>> @@ -4319,6 +4354,9 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>   		secondary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx->secondary_exec_control);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls())
>> +		tertiary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_tertiary_exec_control(vmx));
>> +
>>   	if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&vmx->vcpu)) {
>>   		vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP0, 0);
>>   		vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP1, 0);
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> index 945c6639ce24..448006bd8fa7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> @@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ static inline u32 vmx_vmexit_ctrl(void)
>>   
>>   u32 vmx_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx);
>>   u32 vmx_pin_based_exec_ctrl(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx);
>> +u64 vmx_tertiary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx);
>>   
>>   static inline struct kvm_vmx *to_kvm_vmx(struct kvm *kvm)
>>   {
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>