linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] crypto: add missing kernel_fpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEYymiYaMUobuncmyO-vQxHrOByc7wQn4rKK_wdKuLgXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 11:07:43 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Shreyansh Chouhan <chouhan.shreyansh630@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot+20191dc583eff8602d2d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: add missing kernel_fpu_end() call

On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 11:05, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 10:23, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 07:11:55PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote:
> > > xts_crypt() code doesn't call kernel_fpu_end() after calling
> > > kernel_fpu_begin() if walk.nbytes is 0. Add a call to kernel_fpu_end()
> > > for this case.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+20191dc583eff8602d2d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Chouhan <chouhan.shreyansh630@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > Ard?
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> > > index 2144e54a6c89..bd55a0cd7bde 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> > > @@ -894,6 +894,9 @@ static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
> > >                       kernel_fpu_begin();
> > >       }
> > >
> > > +     if (walk.nbytes == 0)
> > > +             kernel_fpu_end();
> > > +
>
> Don't we end up calling kernel_fpu_end() twice this way if we do enter
> the while() loop at least once?
>

How about the below instead, does that work?

--- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req,
bool encrypt)
                return -EINVAL;

        err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, req, false);
-       if (err)
+       if (err || !walk.nbytes)
                return err;

        if (unlikely(tail > 0 && walk.nbytes < walk.total)) {