[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5b787e6-8022-ff53-bd78-4e57b80485f2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 22:58:44 +0530
From: Mugilraj Dhavachelvan <dmugil2000@...il.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Dragos.Bogdan@...log.com,
Darius.Berghe@...log.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: potentiometer: Add driver support for AD5110
On 07/08/21 5:47 pm, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 8/7/21 7:08 AM, Mugilraj Dhavachelvan wrote:
>> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ad5110_channels[] = {
>> + {
>> + .type = IIO_RESISTANCE,
>> + .output = 1,
>> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET),
>> + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_ENABLE),
> There is only on channel in this device. Why are some `separate` and others `shared_by_type`?
>
No special reason, I'll put everything into 'separate'. Fixed in v2.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists