[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0WRMNmBmBDerZ0nWPdFZKALnxrj-uUFBkTP-MOtv48vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 22:00:22 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:48 PM Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 08:55, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:23:29 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > So, can that be done in the staging tree as it is, or does Greg need to
> > merge (part of) the net-next tree? Or will someone just supply me with
> > a reasonable merge resolution patch? Or does Greg reset the staging
> > tree to 5c872e1d2595 and try again next time? Or similar for Dave
> > (revert Arnd's work)?
> >
> > Currently it is a mess in linux-next and probably will not work even
> > though it does build.
> >
>
> Happy to try and provide a merge resolution patch if that is easier?
> Will be this evening UK time though.
Most likely there is no user space that actually wants this function at all,
so I think the easiest way would be to remove all of rtw_ioctl in the
staging tree version of this driver.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists