linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/7] rtw88: Use rtw_iterate_stas where the iterator reads or writes registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 09 Aug 2021 22:00:34 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tony0620emma@...il.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
        "kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/7] rtw88: Use rtw_iterate_stas where the
 iterator reads or writes registers

> 
> I am thinking rtw88 needs to maintain sta and vif lists itself, 

I would tend to prefer drivers do not maintain separate lists - that's
just duplicated book-keeping and prone to state mismatch errors?

But OTOH the locking does make things complex.

johannes