[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d61f3947cddec660cbb2a59e2424d2bd8c01346a.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 22:00:34 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Pkshih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony0620emma@...il.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
"kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neo Jou <neojou@...il.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/7] rtw88: Use rtw_iterate_stas where the
iterator reads or writes registers
>
> I am thinking rtw88 needs to maintain sta and vif lists itself,
I would tend to prefer drivers do not maintain separate lists - that's
just duplicated book-keeping and prone to state mismatch errors?
But OTOH the locking does make things complex.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists