linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 5.14-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YRGtF69Z8kjsaSkb@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 23:32:55 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] overlayfs fixes for 5.14-rc6

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 02:26:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:25 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I've pulled this,
> 
> Actually, I take that back.
> 
> None of those things have been in linux-next either, and considering
> my worries about it, I want to see more actual testing of this.

Not only that, the changes to fs/namespace.c and mm/util.c haven't been
posted to linux-mm or linux-fsdevel, as far as I can tell.