[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRDqQvKQ71/824Lu@matsya>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:11:38 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@...el.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kishon <kishon@...com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"kris.pan@...ux.intel.com" <kris.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Zhou, Furong" <furong.zhou@...el.com>,
"Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa"
<mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Vaidya, Mahesh R" <mahesh.r.vaidya@...el.com>,
"Srikandan, Nandhini" <nandhini.srikandan@...el.com>,
"Demakkanavar, Kenchappa" <kenchappa.demakkanavar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC
support to the arasan eMMC driver
On 09-08-21, 05:16, A, Rashmi wrote:
> >
> > Rashmi, is it safe to apply this separately from the phy driver/dt changes?
> > Then I can queue this via my mmc tree, if you like.
> No, the phy driver/dt changes must go together with "mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC support to the arasan eMMC driver" patch.
Why is that?
What could happen, emmc driver will complain about phy not found and
bail right?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists