[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRDqQvKQ71/824Lu@matsya>
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:11:38 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@...el.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kishon <kishon@...com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kris.pan@...ux.intel.com" <kris.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Zhou, Furong" <furong.zhou@...el.com>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "Vaidya, Mahesh R" <mahesh.r.vaidya@...el.com>,
        "Srikandan, Nandhini" <nandhini.srikandan@...el.com>,
        "Demakkanavar, Kenchappa" <kenchappa.demakkanavar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC
 support to the arasan eMMC driver
On 09-08-21, 05:16, A, Rashmi wrote:
> > 
> > Rashmi, is it safe to apply this separately from the phy driver/dt changes?
> > Then I can queue this via my mmc tree, if you like.
> No, the phy driver/dt changes must go together with "mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC support to the arasan eMMC driver" patch.
Why is that?
What could happen, emmc driver will complain about phy not found and
bail right?
-- 
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
